The paper is forming into a coherent whole. While I cannot say much at this outset, I must remark that it was a tough job implementing all the changes suggested. It took me at least an hour to set the errors straight and then I had to start working on my quote implements. The quotes implement gave way to the conclusion creation and the final polishing. I have little doubt that the paper will be in some coherent shape by the time its due this weekend. However I also need to ensure that the same mistakes that happened in the Primary Source Analysis is not repeated.
My paper will attempt to discuss the benefits of inclusivity and unity over stereotyping and separation. It will also forewarn about the possibility of a stereotypical union where one side arbitrarily chooses to approach a weaker side for a misbalanced union. Such states are not possible or advisable. My paper will continue to elucidate on this by using the examples of the integration of the European Union. In this example I will focus on the benefits derived by union and the inevitability of its success. I will also focus on those touchy issues which make its fulfillment a burden.
Laws and ideas change across borders and to create a union of such disparate believes will require compromise. The crux of the paper will reside in the fact that this compromise should not contest or dilute the very essence of the issue at stake. That would undermine the very institutions for which so many good people stand.
No comments:
Post a Comment